Vaccination misinformation: a case study from the 1940s

The ScotPublicHealth blog was born in 2015. It was established to provide a space for Public Health reflections relating to Scotland. In 2016 we ran a series of webinars, bringing people together from across the country and beyond. I then took a series of diversions – into quality improvement, General Practice and Twitter analysis. X (formerly Twitter) no longer provides the means for social network analysis, so the blog entered a hiatus from 2021.

I have tidied up the blog, archiving most of the old content, including the Twitter analysis. Please get in touch if you would like access to any of that old material.

So we’re back looking at Public Health.

I thought that it would be timely to talk about vaccine misinformation, disinformation and malinformation. The WHO has a useful summary of the first two terms. The main point is that misinformation is the spread of false information without the intent to mislead, while disinformation is designed or spread with full knowledge of it being false. Malinformation can be “any type of true content used to cause harm“, for example by quoting it out of context. Each of these can be difficult to counter and can impact very significantly on vaccinators, other healthcare staff and vaccine uptake. 

I stumbled across a great example of vaccine misinformation on call last weekend when looking up jazz trumpeter Cootie Williams (1911-1985) during an idle moment. He rubbed shoulders with Duke Ellington and Benny Goodman in the 1930s and 1940s. Flicking through his Wikipedia entry I saw mention of a track called Cowpox Boogie. A number of different webpages claimed that he had contracted smallpox infection from smallpox vaccination, which is not possible. I could not, however, find any posts or articles countering the claim.

The erroneous claim is particularly ironic given the nature of smallpox vaccine and its central role in establishing vaccination more generally in the UK and further afield, saving hundreds of millions of lives in the process. Smallpox was a particularly unpleasant disease causing disfigurement, life-long disability and mortality (in the 18th century estimated at 10-30% of cases). Truly a high consequence infectious disease, with impact across the world for 3-4,000 years. Jenner was not the first to vaccinate people against smallpox, but his proposal was very widely discussed, with early examples of mis-, dis- and no doubt mal- information. Smallpox vaccine was the subject of the famous picture by satirist James Gillray, showing people with bits of cows growing out of various parts of their body, ridiculing the claims against the vaccine but also capturing the anxiety in a section of society. The much longer history of the earlier discovery of smallpox vaccination in other cultures is well worth a read

Gillray’s classic cartoon – The cow-pock,-or-The wonderful effects of the new inoculation! – Vide – the Publications of ye Anti-Vaccine Society (1802)

It is two hundred and thirty years since Edward Jenner first vaccinated a child with the cowpox virus (James Phipps, 14 May 1796), successfully protecting him from the smallpox virus. Jenner’s proposal was to use pus from the hand of a milkmaid called Sarah Nelmes who had caught cowpox from a cow called Blossom. Jenner had observed the protection against smallpox that cowpox infection offered to dairy workers. The word vaccination is of course directly derived from the Latin for cow (vacca). Though the mechanism was not understood at the time, this exposed James Phipps to the cowpox virus, stimulating an immune response that was also protective against smallpox. Phipps developed a scab and slight fever, recovered well, and did not contract smallpox infection a few weeks later following exposure in a further experiment by Jenner. The coxpox virus was finally isolated in 1937.

Compulsory smallpox vaccination had been introduced in England and Wales in 1853 and in Scotland in 1864. The twists and turns of vaccine development in the 19th century meant that by 1937 the smallpox vaccine was based, as it is now, not on cowpox but a related orthopoxvirus called vaccinia. Successive generations of smallpox vaccine have been developed since, with the current version rendered “replication-defective“. It is not possible to catch smallpox from vaccines based on the vaccinia virus – or historically the cowpox virus – modified or otherwise. 

Back to Cootie Williams. In 1947 the band leader was worried about the smallpox outbreak in New York, March-April. Over 6 million people in New York were vaccinated over a short period, and the outbreak was contained to just 12 cases, 2 of whom died. A newspaper article a few weeks later pokes fun at Williams for forcing his band members to get vaccinated only to succumb to the smallpox infection himself. The article does not make a direct causal link between the two, but several social media posts and websites have made that leap subsequently. 

Source: Afro American, 3 May 1947

So, what might have happened? Some people developed fever and rash following smallpox vaccine, and this was potentially more likely with earlier generations of the vaccine. But the implication from other sources is that he was quite unwell, enough to want to mark the period and his recovery with this new tune. If it was smallpox infection, it was not due to the vaccine and he could not even have contracted the infection while waiting in the queue to be vaccinated. The incubation period of smallpox was 7 to 19 days, with an average of 10 to 14 days and we know he became unwell two days later. So if William did catch smallpox, he must have contracted it well before he and band mates attended for vaccination. But the story is out there now. Curiously I have not been able to find a recording of Cowpox Boogie. Please let me know if you track one down.

Smallpox infection was finally eradicated in 1977 (with the exception of a lab worker in 1978 who contracted smallpox after a workplace accident), with eradication marked formally in 1980. It is still the only infectious disease in humans to have been eradicated. 

So how do we counter mis/dis/ mal- information about vaccination? It is unlikely that people repeating and embellishing claims about Cootie Williams and smallpox vaccine will be persuaded to take down their Facebook posts and amend websites and books. If we do come across people questioning the safety of the vaccine – e.g. when offering vaccine for mpox protection – we can easily point to information in the Green Book, patient-facing literature and other sources that explain clearly that Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine – and indeed earlier smallpox vaccines – do not and could not cause smallpox infection. 

More generally, when coming up against vaccine hesitancy or outright antivaxx sentiment we can draw on the 5C model. Of course each strand of this model takes very considerable, continuous and repeated effort across the health service and beyond. We can use such approaches, for example, when discussing MMRV versus MMR, a topic well covered here

The TURAS website also has a useful set of resources including the CASE model (corroborate, about me, science, explain).

If you have an idea for a blog, or comments about this blog, please post a comment.

If you liked this content, please sign up for email updates.

Graham Mackenzie, Consultant in Public Health Medicine, 13/7/2026

Quality improvement – applications in General Practice, planning for end of pandemic

Summary: This blog presents a summary of Quality Improvement methodology and applies it to a question highly relevant to General Practice – how to move away from same day appointments as Covid-19 lockdown loosens, but without overwhelming services. It focuses in on mental health – with an example sequence of PDSA cycles solely for illustrative purposes. It shows how a series of patient encounters (in this case calls to reception to make GP appointments) represents an opportunity for rapid testing, developing an approach that meets the needs of patients and potentially taking pressure off GPs while also providing more patient centred care. The ideas are presented for discussion rather than as a fait accompli. In real life the process of scoping and running a QI project with a team throws up lots of surprises and shakes a lot of assumptions.

I wrote this blog while reflecting on recent discussions with colleagues in a number of settings. It is presented here as a “think piece”, and will hopefully generate discussion in the comments box below. What are your experiences of using QI methods in general practice and other clinical settings?

Dr Graham Mackenzie GP specialty trainee, year 3 of training

Continue reading “Quality improvement – applications in General Practice, planning for end of pandemic”

Health innovation and COVID-19 pandemic: Defining the need and understanding the response.

Health innovation and COVID-19 pandemic: Defining the need and response.

A question heard on the wards recently – how can we capture all the innovations that have emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic? I’m sure that there are similar questions in hospitals, GP surgeries and other organisations across the world.
In order to answer this question we need to start by defining innovation. The World Health Organization (which might want to drop the American spelling in light of recent political decisions) defines health innovation as follows:

“Health innovation is to develop new or improved health policies, systems, products and technologies, and services and delivery methods that improve people’s health, with a special focus on the needs of vulnerable populations.

  • WHO engages in health innovation in the context of universal health coverage
  • Health innovation adds value in the form of improved efficiency, effectiveness, quality, safety and/or affordability
  • Health innovation can be in preventive, promotive, therapeutic, rehabilitative and/or assistive care”

In classic Public Health style WHO identifies 3 overlapping domains necessary to capture health innovation fully – science innovation (R&D), social innovation, and business innovation – each of which we can see in evidence in the wider pandemic response.

This is a useful definition for a number of reasons:

Continue reading “Health innovation and COVID-19 pandemic: Defining the need and understanding the response.”

The Role of Patient Information Leaflets in the Treatment of Patients

A first year medical school report by Kirsty Mackenzie, University of Dundee, written as part of a Student Selected Component (SSC) on Human Factors (March 2018). This is also available as a PDF.

Introduction

Over the past century and particularly over the last few decades, there has been a huge shift in the way in which patients interact with doctors. In the past, patients were given very little information about their conditions or their treatments. Medicine was very paternalistic and there was little room for patients to question the doctor’s decisions or to make choices for themselves. The public had very little scientific knowledge and blindly agreed to treatments that may not have needed or wanted(1). This was not in the best interests of patients because they had no control over their own health and this must have left them feeling less content and more anxious about what they were going through. The old model of ‘doctor knows best’ has in recent times been put aside in favour of ‘person-centred care’. The Royal College of Nursing states ‘[Person centred care] means that the person is an equal partner in the planning of care and that his or her opinions are important and are respected(2).’ This term was first coined by the psychotherapist Carl Rogers building on earlier ideas proposed by healthcare workers. Further building on Rogers’ ideas, the psychiatrist George Engel promoted ‘the move from a medical to a biopsychosocial the move from a medical to a biopsychosocial model of health(3).’ His ideas have been widely credited with being responsible for the shift in the model of care.

Continue reading “The Role of Patient Information Leaflets in the Treatment of Patients”

Communication in a complex world – perspectives for Public Health/ NHS teams

Recently we had a discussion about communication in one of our teams. It’s a regular bugbear in any department:

  • Do we miss important messages in the dozens or hundreds of emails we receive in a day? (Disclosure – I have switched off emails when preparing this blog, so I can concentrate)
  • How should we manage circulars? (When I started work we used to have a paper system with sign off sheets that took many months to circulate around even a relatively small department. While we don’t have paper circulars any more, we still have plenty of emails with links to reports, conferences, consultations, and it remains difficult to keep on top of all this information)
  • Are meetings a waste of time? (They don’t need to be, but frequently are, usually because of problems with communication. Well described by Guy Browning).
  • How do we update colleagues about our work (i.e. internally)? (There are lots of different approaches – weekly information exchange, huddles, notice boards, posters, and of course quarterly and annual reports for corporate objectives)
  • How do we communicate with the outside world (i.e. externally)? (Many public services still don’t even have an up to date website, let alone a blog or social media feed; also peer reviewed journals, freedom of information requests, public committees and other forums).

A group of 3 team members met to discuss options. We weren’t all sure why we were there as the meeting invite hadn’t given context, or if it had it was hidden away. At least had managed to arrive, on time, with only one person missing. We started to explore options. In the spirit of better communication I have written up the meeting as a blog that can be shared on social media.

This blog is also available as a PDF to download.

Continue reading “Communication in a complex world – perspectives for Public Health/ NHS teams”

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, rights of the child, and the joy of learning to play music

A policy post here (originally posted on the Get Healthy Start Facebook page, 22 Mar 2015): on helping Scotland to become the best place to grow up. I have been prompted to dig this out after seeing some recent tweets about Maslow’s hierarchy in the workplace and in schools. See these recent tweets here.

This post looks at UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, article 31 of UNCRC, and the particular gains from teaching more kids a musical instrument. Sources at end of post.

Continue reading “Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, rights of the child, and the joy of learning to play music”

Quality Improvement explained in four everyday objects

Quality Improvement (QI) is a powerful approach for exploring and improving the way that healthcare is delivered. However, the technical terms surrounding the methodology can make QI seem inaccessible. This is a pity, as many of the techniques will be familiar to clinicians through their routine work. QI work is simply about making refinements to the way we work, one patient at a time, building a more reliable process, and keeping our sights on a bigger goal.

This blog explains some of the key principles and approaches of QI work, stripped of its jargon, using 4 common objects as an aide-memoire. The formal QI tools on which these objects are based are listed in the notes section at the end of this blog.

If you’d prefer a video summary then you can find a version here (Youtube).

Continue reading “Quality Improvement explained in four everyday objects”

Public Health advocacy in Scotland during 2017

This blog provides a quick summary of two health/ public health advocacy campaigns in Scotland, both launched at Scottish Parliament during 2017.

Advocacy is an important part of Public Health work. The Public Health Advocacy Institute of Western Australia provides the following definition in their advocacy toolkit:

The word ‘advocate’ actually comes from a Latin word meaning ‘to be called to stand beside’. Advocacy can be thought of as “the pursuit of influencing outcomes – including public policy and resource allocation decisions within political, economic, and social systems and institutions – that directly affect people’s lives.”

The “State of Child Health” report was launched by Royal College of Physicians and Child Health on 26 January 2017, with events across the UK, including a RCPCH Scotland event at Scottish Parliament. I have summarised the Twitter activity around that day here.

The “Fairer Lives Healthier Future” call to action was launched by the Faculty of Public Health in Scotland on 20 September, with events at the Royal College of Physicians Edinburgh and Scottish Parliament. Twitter activity during and after the launch is summarised here.

Continue reading “Public Health advocacy in Scotland during 2017”

What is public health? Some reflections for teaching

From time to time I am asked to explain Public Health to students, colleagues from other disciplines or a more general audience. A traditional approach might be to structure such a session around the three domains of Public Health (health improvement, health protection, quality improvement), building on specific examples:

((+) For an excellent clear description of different types of epidemiology studies see Beaglehole et al’s Basic Epidemiology (free download in multiple languages)).

However, this approach perhaps doesn’t highlight the distinction between individual and population health clearly enough for a general audience. After all, one response to the final example above is to talk about uptake of smoking cessation services and other individual approaches to health. A GP may respond that Maslow’s hierarchy applies to an individual as well as a population – a patient is unlikely to be receptive to ideas about health screening or treatment if they are hungry or worried about their home or job.

As I prepare for a session teaching 4th year medical students this week I am keen to try something different, though informed by these and other key Public Health topics. The focus here is on highlighting the differences between approaches to improve individual and population health.

There is a lot of interest to Public Health in the scientific and general press at the moment. For example, over the last few weeks there have been major studies/ stories about the following topics in the world’s top medical journals:

We can learn from commentary around these stubbornly persistent threats to health: eg this individual reflection on diesel fumes and health in the Guardian. Individual response and action is important, and there is clearly a role for behaviour change and medical treatment, but measures to reduce the impact of these global threats to human health will take work at all levels, from individual to supranational and global approaches. In a period of political and economic uncertainty Public Health tools at regional, national and international level (tax, cost, regulation, legislation) are being discussed again, around topics that would have been as familiar Hogarth as to our Public Health predecessors in the Victorian era and first half of the 20th century.

hogarth

(Image from BMJ 29 October 2016)

Continue reading “What is public health? Some reflections for teaching”

Sardines were never packed so tight!

On Wednesday 2 November 2016 I will be presenting a Patient Voices/ #DNAOfCare film at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London (follow #DNAofCare #Exp4All on the day to see tweets about the event; more info here). I recorded the film with Patient Voices, sponsored by NHS England, in April 2016. Though I originally intended to speak about my current work, I was encouraged to develop a “leadership story” and the film that emerged explored my inspirations and route into Medicine, specialising in Public Health.

Watch film: http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/1024pv384.htm 🎥

The film is about my connections with my Grandfather, K.G.F. Mackenzie and his encounters with Public Health (including typhus, TB, meningococcal disease and much more). The summary of his life, in his own words, is provided below (with thanks to my Father, Bruce Mackenzie, for providing this).

I will be approaching The BMJ to ask if, 16 years too late, they will accept this as an obituary for Kenneth Mackenzie and his wife Helen Gordon.

grandpa-and-me-arab-dress

My Grandfather and me, Shotley Bridge, 1971

This experience has helped me capture my professional raison d’être. The reflections cover the three domains of Public Health – Health Protection, Health Improvement and Service Improvement – as well as key public health topics including poverty and inequalities.It also illustrates the point that Public Health involves a wide workforce, in the NHS and beyond. I plan to use the film to explain the purpose of Public Health work, and how while everything seems to change, some things remain the same.

Graham Mackenzie (@gmacscotland on Twitter)

Consultant in Public Health

31 October 2016

Cynergy_Graham MacKenzie_509 (1)

Watch film: http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/1024pv384.htm 🎥

Continue reading “Sardines were never packed so tight!”